|
Post by The Thayan Menace on Dec 11, 2007 23:53:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beastman on Dec 13, 2007 9:21:13 GMT -5
Yeah and Gary Gygax had entered the petition (96th entry)...
|
|
|
Post by The Thayan Menace on Dec 16, 2007 3:43:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Brix on Dec 17, 2007 6:29:25 GMT -5
I like visionary Grognardism ;D
|
|
|
Post by beastman on Jul 1, 2008 14:25:46 GMT -5
I like visionary Grognardism ;D Indeed a visionary....he was right. don't wanna bash 4e here, just to say this game is not for me (and i have the corebooks *buuuu*) and already test-played three times...So, I already said it (many times) before, i'm sticking with 3.5/PFRP...think I was some type of visonary too ;-)
|
|
|
Post by stormingmarcus on Jul 2, 2008 9:24:51 GMT -5
IMHO 4e (or should we say 4.0, given the fact that someday Wiz's gonna publish 4.x?) isn't totally crap. It has some good ideas (simplification, balance; more specifically, no iterative attack, second wind, skill system), but mixed with horrible ones and not implemented well in the system. Curiously (but it's not very strange) the good ideas i've found so far alla belong to SAGA, which i admit should be the real 3.75, at least in the basics...
|
|